'Extreme' freediving

Deep sea freediver pushes limits

Freediving

Sara Campbell during a constant weight free dive in 2007 when she broke three world records 

  • Freediver stretches the limits of the body
  • Says each dive is an extreme challenge
  • "Has more of the fish gene"

BRITON Sara Campbell is on a mission to stretch the limits of the human
body - diving down into the murky ocean depths for minutes at a time,
on a single gulp of air.


Extreme depth freedivers swim down as far as possible, while coping with pressure that crushes their lungs to the size of a lemon and would wreck their eardrums if they were not careful.

The record-breaking Briton admitted it is tough.

"Each dive is a phenomenal physical and mental challenge,'' the 37-year-old said. "Your body goes through very extreme changes.

"Your heart rate drops, all the blood comes to the centre of your body, and then that blood starts to fill the lung tissues so that the air spaces can contract even more.

"For every 10 metres that you descend, the pressure doubles, so that means your lungs halve in size. So down at 90 metres, 100 metres, they're about a ninth, tenth of the size."

Campbell, who shot from freediving beginner to world record holder within months, is out to break the record again and crack the 100-metre barrier in 2010.

She earned a silver medal at the World Championships in the Bahamas earlier this month with an "easy" dive of 92 metres. That has fired her up to reclaim the world records from her only rival, Russia's Natalia Molchanova, in 2010.

One metre 50 centimetres tall (just under five feet), Campbell's extraordinary ability has rocked the sport of freediving.

Some physiologists believe the yoga trainer from Burnham-on-Crouch in southeast England is a "natural" freediver, able to hit significant depths with little training.

Campbell believes she was born to do freediving, having a strong mammalian diving reflex, which helps mammals optimise their oxygen underwater. Through evolution, dolphins, for example, have a far stronger reflex than humans.

"It probably means I'm a little bit less evolved as a human being, I retain more of the fish gene and have less of the human gene," she said.

Four years ago, fed up with the London rat race, Campbell moved to Dahab, a laid-back diving resort on Egypt's Red Sea coast, to teach yoga. One of her students recommended she try freediving, given her breathing control skills.

Tired of chasing targets, Campbell resisted for a year but gave it a go in April 2006.

Hepatitis A stopped her progress after six weeks but she began training again in April 2007 and, in October that year, set world records in three different disciplines within 48 hours and then claimed a world championships gold medal.

In the blue riband constant weight discipline, freedivers, using flippers, take a weight down with them to speed up the descent but have to bring it back.

Campbell's personal best is 96 metres, a world record achieved in April in three minutes and 36 seconds under water.

She has dived 100 metres twice, but blacked out within a minute on the surface, invalidating the attempts.

Her rival Molchanova broke the 100-metre barrier in September, reaching 101 metres.

No-one else comes close to challenging the pair.

"She and I are now playing ping-pong with the world records," Campbell said.

"It's like the Cold War! There's definite rivalry. It's the two of us battling it out at the top. We'll see what happens next year but having seen how strong my silver medal dive was I'm really fired up.

"I'm certainly not going to sit back and let Natalia push her dives very much deeper."

Campbell enjoys stretching man's boundaries.

"Not so long ago, medical science said beyond 50 metres it is not possible for the human being to survive.

"The exciting thing is you do a dive, you don't know if you can make it but when you do, a door opens and you realise that actually you can go a bit further," she added.

"Human beings have almost limitless potential and a lot of that is governed by the mind. If you believe something, you can achieve it."


Faulkner Family's picture

Posts: 18329

Date Joined: 11/03/08

gotta be nuts or bloody

Sun, 2009-12-20 22:46

gotta be nuts or bloody keen.the things we put our bodys through

____________________________________________________________________________

RUSS and SANDY. A family that fishes together stays together

sunshine's picture

Posts: 2696

Date Joined: 03/03/09

Well she certainly didn't write the article

Mon, 2009-12-21 07:50

Quote from above

 

"For every 10 metres that you descend,
the pressure doubles, so that means your lungs halve in size. So down
at 90 metres, 100 metres, they're about a ninth, tenth of the size."

 

UTTER RUBBISH ..........any diver knows that yes, the pressure doubles between the surface and 10 metres but it doesn't then double every ten metres - the next doubling of pressure occurs at 30 metres and then the gap widens even further as you descend

 

Hmmmm, didn't proof read it either it seems 

Kasey L.'s picture

Posts: 1390

Date Joined: 02/03/06

I believe you are correct in

Mon, 2009-12-21 14:25

I believe you are correct in pointing out how pressure has been misrepresentated at doubling every 10m. The lungs do get squeezed to about a ninth, tenth of the size at 90-100m though.

The explanation:
Pressure increases at the rate of 1 ATM every 10m. At 10m the pressure is 2 ATM, at 20m its 3ATM and so on.

Air volume is reduced proportionate to pressure. At 2 ATM the volume is halved (1/2), at 3 ATM it is a third of surface volume (1/3rd), and so on.

So at 100m, air volume is at 10 ATM... technically the lungs do get compressed to 1/10 of the size.

Anyway just thought I'd work that out

Posts: 9358

Date Joined: 21/02/08

Nearly, 100m is 11at. The

Mon, 2009-12-21 14:26

Nearly, 100m is 11at. The surface is 1at, 10m is 2 and so on down to 100 is 11.

As a fraction, it goes from 1/1 on top,  to 1/2 at 10m, through to 1/11 at 100m.

____________________________________________________________________________

Kasey L.'s picture

Posts: 1390

Date Joined: 02/03/06

Right, of course.

Mon, 2009-12-21 20:48

Right, of course.

Posts: 9358

Date Joined: 21/02/08

Cmon so was that fisherman

Mon, 2009-12-21 20:50

Cmon so was that fisherman mk2 or not =)

____________________________________________________________________________

Posts: 301

Date Joined: 20/12/09

Pressure

Mon, 2009-12-21 08:28

I guess what they were "trying" to get at was that pressure goes up by one bar every 10 meters.

Correct me if I am wrong but the next part of the statment was correct - at 100m your lungs are 10% of their surface size if breathhold diving and your not breathing out on the decent.

The last woman I heard about doing these extreme dives (Im sure there are alot actively diving but just not in the media) had a shallow water blackout and died, as said previously the people doing this must be bloody keen, every dive they are taking their lives into their own hands.

jay_burgess's picture

Posts: 4648

Date Joined: 18/08/05

wow, RESPECT. that's crazy.

Mon, 2009-12-21 14:32

wow, RESPECT.

that's crazy.

Posts: 402

Date Joined: 04/11/09

pressure

Thu, 2009-12-24 16:06

would someone be able to tell me when you dive u gotta ascend slowy in order to not get the bends, how  come these freedivers dont get the bends

fishy fingers's picture

Posts: 1719

Date Joined: 28/04/07

Not going down going up

Thu, 2009-12-24 16:44

You get the bends when ascending due to the nitrogen in your blood and coming out of solution too quick and forming air bubbles in you blood stream, another term used when decompressing is to "gas off" which is to allow the nitrogen to be aspirated from your system at a more natural rate through your normal breathing at normal or near normal surface pressures. sorry just reread you did state ascending.
the free divers dont breath in any extra nitrogen as they are not breathing compressed air they are only compressing what is in their bloodstream when they start the dive and given that nitrogen is expelled from your system relativly quickly
via your(i cant remember the word) system by the time they return to the surface there would be little if any nitrogen left in their blood anyway.... from memory and it's 15 years since I was taught to dive nitrogen is only needed by your body to help the oxygen enter the tissues via the blood stream(someone please remind if I'm wrong) once thats done it's useless therefore "gassed off" so to speak.

Posts: 9358

Date Joined: 21/02/08

Nitrogen isn't needed by

Thu, 2009-12-24 19:00

Nitrogen isn't needed by your body at all, its only there because its expensive to remove, ie; nitrox, and even more expensive to substitute, ie; heliox.

____________________________________________________________________________

fishy fingers's picture

Posts: 1719

Date Joined: 28/04/07

Like I said

Fri, 2009-12-25 06:55

It's been 15 years since learning to dive....my memory dosent serve me well!